Analyzing the social dynamics of the 2020 New York and Milan Fashion Weeks.

What are the major communities interacting with brands?

cluster 2 cluster 1 percentage ofusers relatedto each cluster reachedInstagramaccounts cluster 0 brand 500 3k 6k MILAN FASHION WEEK Cluster 0 italy 506 student 219 liceo 199 university 82 italian 77 Cluster 1 fashion 2314 designer 1054 art 853 stylist 400 model 377 Cluster 2 japan 134 argentina 79 colombia 73 brasil 50 russia 47
cluster 2 cluster 1 percentage ofusers relatedto each cluster reachedInstagramaccounts cluster 0 brand 100 1k 2k NY FASHION WEEK > Cluster 0 fashion 1946 designer 832 art 602 stylist 501 nyc 356 Cluster 1 nyc 135 founder 99 director 43 business 29 manager 26 Cluster 2 argentina 27 ukraine 23 russia 21 brasil 19 japan 16

Knowing the types of users surrounding an online entity could be an interesting insight for a brand itself, given that this information could be useful in order to mold the online contents according to the audience who interact with them. With this analysis we tried to dig into the problem of community detection, studying at a first stage some quantitative numbers such as followers count, followings count and medias count, and then focusing on textual data, such as users’ biography, which lead to a more interesting result.

Main Findings

There are three main communities both for Milan and for New York, and both of them seem to recall almost the same type of users. For New York Fashion Week the share of communities among brands is more or less constant, while for Milano Fashion Week the share of communities is very different from brand to brand, as shown in the image below.

example of secondary visualization


Related to MIFW it is possible to notice that there are some brands, like marni, jilsander or marcodevincenzo, for which the cluster of users related to fashion (i.e. cluster 1) is dominant.

example of secondary visualization


On the other hand, always for MIFW, there are brands which show to be more surrounded by users belonging to cluster 0 (i.e. users which seem to be italian students) or cluster 2 (i.e. users which seem to be international).

example of secondary visualization


Concerning NYFW, it is possible to notice that for every brand the majority of users belongs to cluster 0 (i.e. users related to the fashion world), then there is a share related to international users (i.e. cluster 2) which has almost the same size for each brand. Finally, there is the presence of users belonging to the business-world cluster, which size is variable for each brand.

example of secondary visualization

Protocol

example of protocol